Pages

Monday, September 22, 2014

Dr. Gizmo Column

"Dr. Gizmo"
By Phil Arendt

$1150 Repair Estimate Completed For $88  
Question 1
I am a senior citizen snowbird who lives in Arizona during the winter months and Wisconsin during the summer.  My son stores my 2006 Buick La Crosse indoors while I’m away.  When I returned this summer the air conditioner was not working.

I went to my local dealership where I paid $34.82 for diagnostic work.  The service person said the a/c was so bad that the mechanic could see the trouble from across the shop.  I received an estimate for major repairs totaling nearly $1,200.  They said I should return in a week to have the work completed. 

I went to another shop for a second opinion.  Two hours later my local independent shop had repaired the air conditioner for $88.  It’s been seven weeks since the repair and the a/c works perfectly.  My shop said that if there are any problems to return to have the issue repaired under warranty.

I was going to speak with the dealer owner about the encounter but I did not want to cause problems for the other shop so I refrained from doing so.  I thought you could comment on this issue.  Can you?  J.N., email

Answer 1
I certainly appreciate your letter.  Thanks for sharing your experience.  You made the right decision by seeking a second opinion.  Any time there is a large repair estimate it’s a good idea to get a second opinion.

As a certified arbitrator and mediator for decades, I’ve heard hundreds and hundreds of cases in which I made decisions based upon the evidence from the parties in my hearings.  With your letter there was a partial copy of the dealer shop estimate.  I did not see a repair receipt from the second shop that did the repair so I have only a partial picture of what needed repair and why. 

Be this as it may, your dealer representative obviously used poor judgment in saying his technician could see the trouble from across the shop.  His technician must have x-ray vision.  For $34.82 that’s about all he used to diagnose the trouble while condemning expensive parts such as a compressor and refrigerant line for a leak.  The estimate was accurate for replacing those parts but since your car was repaired for much less, those parts were not needed.  I wish I could pat you on the back for making a sound decision on whom to award the repair.

Another important aspect of this episode is that your second shop repaired the issue to your satisfaction at a fraction of the cost of the original dealership estimate without needing to replace previously condemned parts.  His x-ray vision is even more acute and probably backed up his diagnosis with a few tests.  Consider visiting his shop for future preventive maintenance and repairs.    

Wear And Tear Taking Toll On Transmission
Question 2
I have a 4L80E transmission in my 2002 Chevrolet Crew Cab 4x4 HD truck.  It has a slight hesitation going into overdrive once in a while going up a gradual incline.  It doesn't do it all the time.  I think third gear is just a little too grabby.

The truck and transmission have 135,000 miles.  The trans has been flushed twice and the filter has been changed once.  I also had the shift solenoids changed, but the trouble continues. 

Do you have any ideas? A.B., email

 
Answer 2
It’s time to dump the truck.  All kidding aside, at this mileage and age the transmission is a candidate for replacement or overhaul.  The trans in your truck is pretty expensive so an overhaul might be less expensive.  Having said this, if the hesitation is not too much of an annoyance, and you can live with it, consider waiting until the concern becomes worse or the transmission gives up.  If this doesn’t suit your fancy visit a transmission specialist.  An adjustment might resolve the issue.  Also, it is possible there is a programming issue that is causing the problem.  However, from what you describe there likely is an issue with internal wear.

 
Noise At Front Of Engine Due To Excessive Wear
Question 3
The check engine light turned on in my 2004 Nissan Maxima with 176,000 miles.  Also, the engine idle is not smooth.  I went to my local shop that has been servicing the car for many years.  One of the technicians did a number of tests.  He said that there is excessive noise at the front of the engine which is an indication that it needs a timing chain.  He also said that the camshaft sensor tests good but it might be bad but he thinks the trouble might be caused by the timing chain. 

The shop manager says the timing chain repair is expensive.  He will write an estimate for that work but he won’t know until the work is completed if the car will need sensors or other work.  I’m hesitant to do any work to the vehicle since it is 10 years old and has so many miles.  It’s in great shape and has never giving me a bit of trouble since it was new but I don’t want to sink a lot of money into it. 

Does what they told me make sense to you?  Should I keep the car?  N.D., email

 
Answer 3
Certainly repairing the car although is expensive is much less expensive than purchasing a car but that decision is up to you. 

Your technician appears to be on the right track.  It’s entirely possible that the noise from the front of the engine is caused by excessive wear of the timing chain and related parts.  It’s also possible that the check engine light illuminated due to timing issues of the camshaft relative to the crankshaft.  This also causes issues with the camshaft sensor.  The sensor reports timing to the engine control module.  If the timing is off, the light illuminates and sets a code indicating possible trouble with the sensor.

It’s time to take into consideration the repair estimate.  Then you can decide to fix the condition or replace the car.

 
No Need To Yank Out Engine
Question 4
I have a 1999 Suzuki Grand Vitara with a 2.5 engine.  It’s in great condition although it has 140,000 miles.  There is noise from the front of the engine.  My shop says the timing chain is the cause of the noise.  They said they have to take out the engine to replace it.  It’s an expensive job.

How much is it to replace the timing chain?  Do they have to take out the engine?  G.R., email

 
Answer 4
I’m sorry but we don’t provide repair estimates.  It is an expensive repair and it does take a lot of effort. 

It’s not necessary to remove the engine.  A technician removes everything from the front of the engine to gain access to the timing chain.  It’s a tight space, but once accessories are out of the way there is enough room to replace the worn out chain.

 
Restricted Exhaust Impairs Turbo Boost
Question 5
Recently, engine power dropped in my turbocharged 2005 Audi A4.  My shop has looked at the car a couple of times but has not come up with a cure for the problem.  He has checked the turbocharger and associated parts and can’t find anything wrong.  He has checked for trouble codes, bad solenoids, a faulty waste gate, checked for leaks, road tested the car with test equipment hooked up but he can’t find the problem.  He is sure something has gone wrong with the turbo and continues to find a code for low boost.  He says that at this point he wants to replace the turbo but he is not sure it will fix the trouble. 

My car has a 1.8-liter engine, an automatic transmission and 122,000 miles.  It’s in like new condition and I have followed the factory service schedule since it was new.  Until recently it has run strong and now it lacks power.  I can tell the turbo is not kicking in when I hit the gas.  Other than this, the car is perfect.  Can you help?  P.D.S., email

 
Answer 5
Yes indeed.  It’s time for a new Audi.  All kidding aside sometimes, and this happens to all of us, we become so focused we get stuck in a loop and can’t move forward with a project.  That’s when it is time to step back, take a deep breath or even walk away and do something else to unwind and gather thoughts. 

If everything checks perfectly except for the low boost code, there is something inhibiting its operation.  Ask your technician if he has looked into the possibility that something in the exhaust system is restricted.  Back pressure in the exhaust can impair turbocharger operation.  A pipe may be bent.  It’s possible the catalytic converter or muffler is blocked.  Tests can determine if a problem in the exhaust system is affecting performance.  A new catalytic converter might resolve the issue.

 
Rebuilt Module Fails To Fix Trouble
Question 6
I have a 1997 Infinity QX4 with a 3.3 engine that is in like new condition with only 66,000 miles.  It’s a great vehicle.  It hasn’t given me any trouble all these years although I have had to replace the battery, tires and brakes. 

Last week the engine would not start.  When I turned the key the engine turned but it did not start.  I had it towed to my local repair shop that has been servicing it for many years.  A mechanic did some tests and can get the engine to start if he jumps a relay that activates the fuel injectors.  He said the engine computer module is not completing a circuit to activate the relay.  He sent the module to a place that rebuilds them.  It took a week for them to send it back.  He installed the rebuilt module and he had the same problem.   He says the module is still the cause of the problem and is sending it back to the rebuilder.

Does this sound right to you or do you think something else is wrong?  W.J., email

 
Answer 6
Your technician is on the right track.  The engine control module does complete the circuit to a relay that energizes the fuel injectors.  It does this by completing a ground circuit for the relay.  If the module is not doing its job he should send it back to the company that allegedly rebuilt it.

The problem is that this issue leaves you without a vehicle causing a lot of inconvenience.  I hope you have alternate transportation.  Once the repaired module is installed, your Q should be back on the road.

Thank you for all the great questions.  Dr. Gizmo can’t wait to answer more.

Phil Arendt is a columnist, consultant and A.S.E.-Certified Master Technician.  Readers may send questions to Dr. Gizmo at P.O. Box 548, Cary, IL. 60013 or e-mail address drgizmo@hotmail.com.  08/04/2014 ® DR. GIZMO © 1989 - Present

No comments:

Post a Comment